<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Attention-Sinks on Chen Kai Blog</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/attention-sinks/</link><description>Recent content in Attention-Sinks on Chen Kai Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/attention-sinks/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>LLM Engineering (6): Long Context — RoPE, YaRN, Sinks</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/llm-engineering/06-long-context/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.chenk.top/en/llm-engineering/06-long-context/</guid><description>&lt;p>&amp;ldquo;1M token context&amp;rdquo; is one of the most over-claimed numbers in LLMs. A model can attend to 1M tokens — that&amp;rsquo;s an architecture statement. A model can &lt;em>use&lt;/em> information at position 800K to answer a question — that&amp;rsquo;s a behavior statement, and it&amp;rsquo;s more challenging. This chapter covers the math of position encoding, the engineering tricks that extend context beyond the training length, and why most long-context claims fail needle-in-a-haystack tests.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>