<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Curves on Chen Kai Blog</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/curves/</link><description>Recent content in Curves on Chen Kai Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/curves/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Differential Geometry (1): Curves in Space — Curvature, Torsion, and the Frenet Frame</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/differential-geometry/01-curves-in-space/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.chenk.top/en/differential-geometry/01-curves-in-space/</guid><description>&lt;p>I am going to start this series the way every honest course on differential geometry starts: with a single moving particle in &lt;span class="math-inline">$\mathbb{R}^3$&lt;/span>
. Not a manifold, not a fiber bundle, not even a surface — just a dot tracing a path. Everything later — Gauss maps, second fundamental forms, connections, Riemannian curvature tensors — is in some sense an effort to do for higher-dimensional objects what we are about to do, very thoroughly, for a one-dimensional one. So bear with the warm-up. The pay-off is that by the end of this article we will own a complete local theory: two scalar functions (&lt;span class="math-inline">$\kappa$&lt;/span>
, &lt;span class="math-inline">$\tau$&lt;/span>
) and one orthonormal frame (&lt;span class="math-inline">$\mathbf{T}, \mathbf{N}, \mathbf{B}$&lt;/span>
) that together pin down a curve up to rigid motion. The slogan is &amp;ldquo;curve = two numbers per point&amp;rdquo;, and that slogan deserves a proof.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>