<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Differential-Forms on Chen Kai Blog</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/differential-forms/</link><description>Recent content in Differential-Forms on Chen Kai Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/differential-forms/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Differential Geometry (8): Differential Forms — The Natural Language of Integration on Manifolds</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/differential-geometry/08-differential-forms/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.chenk.top/en/differential-geometry/08-differential-forms/</guid><description>&lt;p>In vector calculus on &lt;span class="math-inline">$\mathbb{R}^3$&lt;/span>
, we have three derivative operations: gradient (&lt;span class="math-inline">$\nabla f$&lt;/span>
), curl (&lt;span class="math-inline">$\nabla \times F$&lt;/span>
), and divergence (&lt;span class="math-inline">$\nabla \cdot F$&lt;/span>
). Each operates on a different type of object (scalar fields, vector fields). Two identities — &lt;span class="math-inline">$\nabla \times (\nabla f) = 0$&lt;/span>
 and &lt;span class="math-inline">$\nabla \cdot (\nabla \times F) = 0$&lt;/span>
 — sit there looking like happy coincidences. The three integral theorems (the fundamental theorem for line integrals, the classical Stokes&amp;rsquo; theorem, the divergence theorem) appear unrelated and unmotivated except by their statements.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>