<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Expectation Maximization on Chen Kai Blog</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/expectation-maximization/</link><description>Recent content in Expectation Maximization on Chen Kai Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/expectation-maximization/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ML Math Derivations (13): EM Algorithm and GMM</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/ml-math-derivations/13-em-algorithm-and-gmm/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.chenk.top/en/ml-math-derivations/13-em-algorithm-and-gmm/</guid><description>&lt;p>When data has hidden structure — like an unobserved cluster label, a missing feature, or an unseen topic — maximum likelihood becomes challenging. The log of a sum has no closed form, and gradient methods get entangled with the latent variables. The &lt;strong>EM algorithm&lt;/strong> sidesteps the difficulty with a deceptively simple idea: alternate between &lt;em>guessing&lt;/em> the hidden variables under a posterior (E-step) and &lt;em>fitting&lt;/em> the parameters as if those guesses were true (M-step). Each iteration is mathematically guaranteed to push the likelihood up. This post derives EM from first principles, proves the monotone-ascent property using Jensen&amp;rsquo;s inequality, and explores its most famous application: &lt;strong>Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM)&lt;/strong> — the soft, elliptical generalization of K-means.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>