<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ideals on Chen Kai Blog</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/ideals/</link><description>Recent content in Ideals on Chen Kai Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/ideals/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Abstract Algebra (5): Rings and Ideals — When Multiplication Enters the Picture</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/abstract-algebra/05-rings-and-ideals/</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.chenk.top/en/abstract-algebra/05-rings-and-ideals/</guid><description>&lt;p>Groups capture symmetry through a single operation. But most of the number systems we actually compute with &amp;mdash; integers, polynomials, matrices &amp;mdash; carry two operations that interact: addition and multiplication. The moment you want to talk about divisibility, factorization, or solving equations, one operation is not enough. You need a &lt;em>ring&lt;/em>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This article develops ring theory from scratch: the axioms, the key examples, the pathologies that make ring theory richer (and harder) than group theory, and the central concept of an &lt;em>ideal&lt;/em> &amp;mdash; the ring-theoretic analogue of a normal subgroup. By the end you will have the language to state the First Isomorphism Theorem for rings and to understand why &amp;ldquo;modding out by an ideal&amp;rdquo; is the right way to build new rings from old ones.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>