<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Modules on Chen Kai Blog</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/modules/</link><description>Recent content in Modules on Chen Kai Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/modules/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Abstract Algebra (9): Modules — Generalizing Vector Spaces</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/abstract-algebra/09-modules/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.chenk.top/en/abstract-algebra/09-modules/</guid><description>&lt;p>In every linear algebra course, you learn to work over a field: real numbers, complex numbers, or perhaps a finite field. The resulting theory is remarkably clean — every subspace has a complement, every finitely generated vector space has a basis, and all bases have the same cardinality. But what happens when we replace the field with a ring?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The answer is &lt;em>modules&lt;/em>: the natural generalization of vector spaces, where scalars come from a ring rather than a field. The theory is richer, the pathologies more interesting, and — perhaps most importantly — modules turn out to encompass an enormous range of mathematical objects: abelian groups (modules over &lt;span class="math-inline">$\mathbb{Z}$&lt;/span>
), vector spaces with a linear endomorphism (modules over &lt;span class="math-inline">$K[x]$&lt;/span>
), ideals (modules over a ring), and group representations (modules over a group ring). What initially feels like a technical generalization is actually a unifying framework that organizes much of algebra.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>