<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Normed-Spaces on Chen Kai Blog</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/normed-spaces/</link><description>Recent content in Normed-Spaces on Chen Kai Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2021 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/normed-spaces/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Functional Analysis (2): Normed Spaces and Banach Spaces</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/functional-analysis/02-normed-and-banach/</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2021 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.chenk.top/en/functional-analysis/02-normed-and-banach/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-a-norm-is-more-than-a-metric-wearing-a-hat" class="heading-anchor">Why a Norm Is More Than a Metric Wearing a Hat&lt;a href="#why-a-norm-is-more-than-a-metric-wearing-a-hat" class="heading-link" aria-label="Permalink to this section" title="Copy link to this section">#&lt;/a>
&lt;/h2>&lt;p>&lt;figure class="article-figure">
 &lt;img src="https://blog-pic-ck.oss-cn-beijing.aliyuncs.com/posts/en/functional-analysis/figures/02_lp_morph.gif" alt="Animation: l^p unit ball morphing as p changes" loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="content-image">
 
&lt;/figure>
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In Article 1, the metric was a free-standing function on a set with no algebraic structure. That generality bought us topology and completeness, but it gave nothing back to the algebra. The moment I am willing to assume the underlying set is a vector space, a more rigid object becomes available: a &lt;strong>norm&lt;/strong>, a single nonnegative function on the space whose induced metric &lt;span class="math-inline">$d(x,y) = \|x - y\|$&lt;/span>
 is &lt;em>translation-invariant&lt;/em> and &lt;em>positively homogeneous&lt;/em>.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>