<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Portfolio Optimization on Chen Kai Blog</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/portfolio-optimization/</link><description>Recent content in Portfolio Optimization on Chen Kai Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/portfolio-optimization/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Optimization (12): Discrete and Global Optimization</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/optimization-theory/12-discrete-global-optimization/</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.chenk.top/en/optimization-theory/12-discrete-global-optimization/</guid><description>&lt;p>The first eleven articles in this series tackled &lt;strong>continuous convex&lt;/strong> problems (or convex relaxations of non-convex ones). This final article addresses two harder regimes:&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Discrete optimization&lt;/strong>: variables take integer or combinatorial values. The feasible set is a finite (but exponentially large) collection of points. Linear and convex tools no longer apply directly because there are no derivatives across the integer lattice.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Global non-convex optimization&lt;/strong>: variables are continuous but the function has many local minima, and we want the &lt;em>global&lt;/em> one. Methods like Newton and L-BFGS only find local minima.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>Both regimes share a key feature: &lt;strong>provably optimal algorithms are exponential&lt;/strong> in the worst case. Practical solutions come from (a) exact algorithms with smart pruning (branch-and-bound) and (b) heuristics that find good (but not optimal) solutions in polynomial time.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>