<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Statistical Models on Chen Kai Blog</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/statistical-models/</link><description>Recent content in Statistical Models on Chen Kai Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2024 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.chenk.top/en/tags/statistical-models/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Time Series Forecasting (1): Traditional Statistical Models</title><link>https://www.chenk.top/en/time-series/01-traditional-models/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.chenk.top/en/time-series/01-traditional-models/</guid><description>&lt;p>The first time I touched data that &amp;ldquo;looked like a time series&amp;rdquo; — hourly server CPU usage — my instinct was to throw it at a linear regression. Time on the x-axis, usage on the y-axis. The fit was terrible. The problem wasn&amp;rsquo;t the regression; the problem was that this kind of data has its own personality. It has trends, seasonality, and a stubborn dependence between consecutive observations. A vanilla regression treats every row as an independent sample and throws away the one piece of information that matters most: time itself.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>